Timeline for What is an étale theta function?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 27, 2015 at 22:16 | history | edited | Minhyong Kim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2015 at 16:20 | history | edited | Minhyong Kim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 313 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2015 at 2:15 | comment | added | user9072 | @SébastienPalcoux the link is broken "by design" as is explained in the sentence following it. | |
| Dec 12, 2015 at 17:00 | comment | added | Sebastien Palcoux | Your new link is broken, could you update it? Moreover, do you have something to say about the following post: mathoverflow.net/q/223649/34538? | |
| Dec 12, 2015 at 15:38 | history | edited | Minhyong Kim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 196 characters in body
|
| Dec 12, 2015 at 13:46 | history | edited | Minhyong Kim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 340 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 10:26 | history | edited | Minhyong Kim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 97 characters in body
|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 13:28 | comment | added | Felipe Voloch | @VesselinDimitrov I asked Mochizuki if there was a simplified version of his method to prove the Mordell conjecture (I assume Siegel-Shafarevich would be similar) and he said no. That doesn't mean that there isn't one, though. | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 6:47 | comment | added | Vesselin Dimitrov | (continued.) Even if $S = \{v_0\}$ is a singleton, in which case there is only one place of $F$ to worry about (and everything amounts to bounding $\mathrm{ord}_{v_0} (1/j_E)$), this could be a good showcase of the theory. For, even then, a global multiplicative subspace need not exist: $E[l]$ (for any $l > 1$) need not have an order $l$ subgroup rational over $F$, by which to divide through following Tate's idea. | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 6:27 | comment | added | Vesselin Dimitrov | One suggestion: It could be illuminating to go through the papers with the more particular task of getting a new proof following IUTT just of the Siegel-Shafarevich theorem, that there are finitely many elliptic schemes on $\mathrm{Spec} \, O_{F,S}$. Presumably a lot of the points will simplify. Say, assume the complex moduli are bounded and $E/F$ has good reduction outside of $S$, and bad multiplicative reduction at all primes in $S$, each of which is of odd residue characteristic. Under these conditions, how do the papers succeed in bounding $\mathrm{ord}_v(1/j_E)$, for $v \in S$? | |
| Nov 11, 2015 at 1:31 | comment | added | Felipe Voloch | This is very useful, thanks for doing that. I suggest that you post this on the workshop website. It's not clear that many people (particularly among the attendees) are getting their information through Mathoverflow, which has not been a good venue to discuss Mochizuki's work. | |
| Nov 10, 2015 at 23:12 | history | edited | Minhyong Kim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Nov 10, 2015 at 23:06 | history | answered | Minhyong Kim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |