Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 8, 2015 at 21:51 comment added Ariyan Javanpeykar My apologies. I now see the point.
Nov 8, 2015 at 21:46 comment added Laurent Moret-Bailly @AriyanJavanpeykar: But we don't know (yet) that $X\in\mathscr{M}_g(S)$.
Nov 8, 2015 at 19:13 comment added Ariyan Javanpeykar ...More precicely, for all schemes $S$ and for all $X$ and $Y$ over $S$ (in $\mathcal M_g(S)$), the morphism $\mathrm{Isom}_S(X,Y)\to S$ is proper. (If $g\geq 2$, this morphism is finite. But this is not the case when $g=1$.) The given isomorphism $X_U \cong X^\prime_U$ induces a section of $Isom_S(X,Y)$ over $U$. Since $S$ is regular (noetherian) this "generic section" extends to a section over $S$. See Gabber-Liu-Lorenzini Prop 6.2 math.u-bordeaux1.fr/~qliu/articles/GLL2-Duke.pdf .
Nov 8, 2015 at 19:13 comment added Ariyan Javanpeykar @TimoKeller In the last part of Moret-Bailly's answer one can also argue as follows. Let $S$ be an integral noetherian regular scheme. Assume $g\geq 1$ and assume that $X_U\cong X_U^\prime$, where $X$ and $X^\prime$ are curves over $S$ in $\mathcal M_g(S)$ and $U\subset S$ is a dense open. The fact that this isomorphism extends to an isomorphism of $X$ and $X^\prime$ over $S$ follows from the separatedness of the stack $\mathcal M_g$ of smooth proper curves of genus $g$...
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:35 vote accept CommunityBot moved from User.Id=19475 by developer User.Id=69903
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:35 comment added Laurent Moret-Bailly @TimoKeller: yes, that's right.
Nov 7, 2015 at 17:09 comment added user19475 Thank you very much! So you prove that the locus of bad reduction has codimension $\leq 1$?
Nov 7, 2015 at 14:11 history answered Laurent Moret-Bailly CC BY-SA 3.0