Timeline for Automorphisms of Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces and semidirect products (and the odd line)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 9, 2015 at 18:50 | vote | accept | David Carchedi | ||
Nov 9, 2015 at 18:50 | history | edited | David Carchedi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 166 characters in body
|
Nov 8, 2015 at 11:30 | answer | added | Anton Fetisov | timeline score: 10 | |
Nov 8, 2015 at 8:01 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | For Eilenberg-MacLane spectra the second term does not appear. | |
Nov 8, 2015 at 7:18 | comment | added | HJRW | Could you explain your definitions please? I can't come up with candidates which make your first assertion correct in the case where $A=\mathbb{Z}$ and $n=1$. | |
Nov 8, 2015 at 5:33 | history | edited | David Carchedi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
S Nov 7, 2015 at 15:32 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typos: autmorphisms -> automorphisms, eilgenberg -> eilenberg, maclane -> mac lane, principal -> principle
|
Nov 7, 2015 at 15:10 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Nov 7, 2015 at 15:32 | |||||
Nov 7, 2015 at 8:23 | comment | added | David Carchedi | I see how both parts act. My question is how do we see this is everything? | |
Nov 7, 2015 at 8:19 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | The $\text{Aut}(A)$ part is hopefully easy to see. The other part is the translation action of $K(A, n)$ on itself. So this is at least a natural guess. In general there's always a natural action of $G \rtimes \text{Aut}(G)$ on $G$ (as a set). | |
Nov 7, 2015 at 7:47 | history | asked | David Carchedi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |