Timeline for Can I relate the L1 norm of a function to its Fourier expansion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2010 at 15:44 | answer | added | Kaveh Khodjasteh | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 23, 2010 at 21:27 | vote | accept | Gregory Putzel | ||
| Apr 23, 2010 at 16:51 | history | edited | Gregory Putzel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added specifics about Boltzmann weight, more motivation, added applications tag.
|
| Apr 23, 2010 at 16:32 | answer | added | gowers | timeline score: 10 | |
| Apr 23, 2010 at 16:10 | comment | added | Gregory Putzel | Yes, I'll add that to the question. | |
| Apr 23, 2010 at 15:17 | comment | added | fedja | Can you be a bit more specific about what you mean by "Boltzmann probability distribution with energy equal to the stretching energy plus the area-energy". What exactly are the space of states and the density function here? | |
| Apr 23, 2010 at 1:58 | history | edited | Yemon Choi |
added fourier-analysis tag
|
|
| Apr 23, 2010 at 1:13 | comment | added | Kaveh Khodjasteh | A comment in passing before proper answers appear: I do not think you can write L$_1$ norm in terms of the Fourier transform but L$_1$ norm is upper bounded by the L$_2$ norm which would be related to the length of the FT vector. I don't think it is possible to have an analogue of FT for L$_p$ norm for $p<2$. | |
| Apr 23, 2010 at 0:28 | history | asked | Gregory Putzel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |