Timeline for Derivations annihilated by powers of the augmentation ideal
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 9, 2015 at 10:33 | vote | accept | grok | ||
Nov 8, 2015 at 9:01 | answer | added | darij grinberg | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 4, 2015 at 22:41 | comment | added | grok | Thanks a lot! Would you mind typing your answer as an answer, so you would get appropriate credit? | |
Nov 4, 2015 at 21:30 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Actually there is an even simpler argument: First prove $\delta\left(I^{m+1}\right) \subseteq I^m$ (for instance, by induction over $m$, or by the generalized Leibniz identity as above); thus, $\delta\left(I^{m+1}\right) f = 0$. Then, argue using $\delta\left(if\right) = \delta\left(i\right) f + i \delta\left(f\right)$ for $i \in I^{m+1}$. | |
Nov 4, 2015 at 21:28 | comment | added | darij grinberg | (Notice that $R$ needs not be commutative here, and $\varpi$ can be any two-sided ideal, not necessarily the augmentation ideal.) | |
Nov 4, 2015 at 21:27 | comment | added | darij grinberg | To the non-bonus question: The Leibniz identity (generalized to multiple factors) yields $\delta\left(i_1 i_2 \cdots i_{m+1} f\right) = \sum_{k=1}^{m+1} i_1 i_2 \cdots i_{k-1} \delta\left(i_k\right) i_{k+1} i_{k+2} \cdots i_{m+1} f + i_1 i_2 \cdots i_{m+1} \delta\left(f\right)$ for all $i_1, i_2, \ldots, i_{m+1} \in \varpi$. Argue that both the left hand side and each addend of the sum on the right hand side are zero. Conclude that the second addend of the right hand side is zero, and thus $\varpi^{m+1} \delta\left(f\right) = 0$. | |
Nov 4, 2015 at 21:21 | history | asked | grok | CC BY-SA 3.0 |