Timeline for Multiplicative cohomology theories and smash products
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2015 at 16:24 | comment | added | Sebastian Goette | I see. I somehow suspected that Adams' remark might make more sense in its historical context than from our modern perspective. I was still kind of hoping for a somewhat more general notion of a product, though. | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 16:19 | vote | accept | Sebastian Goette | ||
| Nov 4, 2015 at 13:59 | comment | added | Tyler Lawson | This is at least partially supported by his statement afterwards: that as a result of not every pairing being defined like this, we would like a definition of $E \wedge F$ as a "spectrum in good standing". | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 6:14 | history | answered | Tyler Lawson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |