Timeline for Reference for de Rham cohomology in positive characteristic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2019 at 5:00 | vote | accept | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | ||
| Nov 4, 2019 at 4:38 | answer | added | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 3, 2019 at 8:56 | comment | added | user20948 | Did you eventually find a good reference? I came up with Bhatt's paper on $p$-adic derived de Rham cohomology, but it seems that no Poincaré duality is seriously covered. | |
| Nov 2, 2015 at 20:31 | history | edited | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
explained the reason for the reference request
|
| Nov 2, 2015 at 4:03 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 23 | |
| Nov 1, 2015 at 1:45 | comment | added | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | I think so, yes, but I haven't gone over the whole argument in enough detail to be completely confident. | |
| Nov 1, 2015 at 1:17 | comment | added | nfdc23 | Are you claiming you can prove this always holds, without exceptions (e.g., including cases where the Hodge to dR spectral sequence doesn't degenerate)? | |
| Oct 31, 2015 at 20:39 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 31, 2015 at 20:58 | |||||
| Oct 31, 2015 at 20:38 | history | asked | R. van Dobben de Bruyn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |