Timeline for Complete regularity in C*-algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Oct 26, 2015 at 22:56 | history | edited | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo corrected and slightly improved formatting of the main question.
|
| Oct 25, 2015 at 14:35 | history | edited | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added more details of Rosický's paper together with a link to this and another related question.
|
| Oct 24, 2015 at 19:46 | history | edited | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo corrected
|
| Oct 24, 2015 at 17:49 | history | edited | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typos corrected
|
| Oct 24, 2015 at 12:50 | history | edited | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified the difference between regularity and complete regularity.
|
| Oct 23, 2015 at 21:15 | history | edited | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
The last part has now been put in a separate question.
|
| Oct 23, 2015 at 18:23 | history | edited | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Actually 1.$\Leftrightarrow$2.
|
| Oct 23, 2015 at 18:10 | history | edited | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
At the end 1.$\Rightarrow$2. is elementary, no need for my previous comments.
|
| Oct 23, 2015 at 17:50 | history | answered | Tristan Bice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |