Skip to main content
deleted 19 characters in body
Source Link
Eric Naslund
  • 11.4k
  • 1
  • 66
  • 106

For $1<c<c_0$, for some constant $c_0$ the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, when $c$ is not too large, one can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta,$$ or alternatively $$E(A)=\frac{1}{N}\int_{0}^{1}\left|\sum_{n\leq N^{1/c}}e(\lfloor n^{c}\rfloor\theta)\right|^{4}d\theta.$$

Remark: I am not sure how large$$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta.$$ The sum $c_0$$S_A(\theta)$ can be handled by noting that $[(n+1)^{1/c}]-[n^{1/c}]$ is the indicator function for the Piatetski-Shapiro sequence, butand then using the asymptotic definitely breaks downtruncated Fourier series for $c=2$the sawtooth function.

For $1<c<c_0$, for some constant $c_0$ the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, when $c$ is not too large, one can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta,$$ or alternatively $$E(A)=\frac{1}{N}\int_{0}^{1}\left|\sum_{n\leq N^{1/c}}e(\lfloor n^{c}\rfloor\theta)\right|^{4}d\theta.$$

Remark: I am not sure how large $c_0$ can be, but the asymptotic definitely breaks down for $c=2$.

For $1<c<c_0$, for some constant $c_0$ the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, when $c$ is not too large, one can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta.$$ The sum $S_A(\theta)$ can be handled by noting that $[(n+1)^{1/c}]-[n^{1/c}]$ is the indicator function for the Piatetski-Shapiro sequence, and then using the truncated Fourier series for the sawtooth function.

added 11 characters in body; added 1 character in body
Source Link
Eric Naslund
  • 11.4k
  • 1
  • 66
  • 106

For $c$ not too much greater than $1$$1<c<c_0$, for some constant $c_0$ the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, for small values ofwhen $c$ youis not too large, one can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta,$$ or alternatively $$E(A)=\frac{1}{N}\int_{0}^{1}\left|\sum_{n\leq N^{1/c}}e(\lfloor n^{c}\rfloor\theta)\right|^{4}d\theta.$$

Remark: I am not sure for what the value ofhow large $c$$c_0$ can be, but the asymptotic definitely breaks down, but it certainly does not hold with for $c=2$.

For $c$ not too much greater than $1$, the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, for small values of $c$ you can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta,$$ or alternatively $$E(A)=\frac{1}{N}\int_{0}^{1}\left|\sum_{n\leq N^{1/c}}e(\lfloor n^{c}\rfloor\theta)\right|^{4}d\theta.$$

Remark: I am not sure for what the value of $c$ the asymptotic breaks down, but it certainly does not hold with $c=2$.

For $1<c<c_0$, for some constant $c_0$ the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, when $c$ is not too large, one can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta,$$ or alternatively $$E(A)=\frac{1}{N}\int_{0}^{1}\left|\sum_{n\leq N^{1/c}}e(\lfloor n^{c}\rfloor\theta)\right|^{4}d\theta.$$

Remark: I am not sure how large $c_0$ can be, but the asymptotic definitely breaks down for $c=2$.

added 11 characters in body; added 1 character in body
Source Link
Eric Naslund
  • 11.4k
  • 1
  • 66
  • 106

For small values of $c>1$$c$ not too much greater than $1$, the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, for small values of $c$ you can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta,$$ or alternatively $$E(A)=\frac{1}{N}\int_{0}^{1}\left|\sum_{n\leq N^{1/c}}e(\lfloor n^{c}\rfloor\theta)\right|^{4}d\theta.$$

Remark: I am not sure for what the value of $c$ the asymptotic breaks down, but it certainly does not hold with $c=2$.

For small values of $c>1$, the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, for small values of $c$ you can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta,$$ or alternatively $$E(A)=\frac{1}{N}\int_{0}^{1}\left|\sum_{n\leq N^{1/c}}e(\lfloor n^{c}\rfloor\theta)\right|^{4}d\theta.$$

Remark: I am not sure for what the value of $c$ the asymptotic breaks down, but it certainly does not hold with $c=2$.

For $c$ not too much greater than $1$, the circle method will yield an asymptotic of size $$E(A)\sim \mathfrak{S}N^{4/c-1.}$$ where $\mathfrak{S}$ is a constant. In fact, for small values of $c$ you can even obtain an asymptotic for the additive energy of the Piatetski-Shapiro primes (see Balog and Friedlander). Letting $S_{A}(\theta)=\mathbb{E}_{n\leq N}1_{A}(n)e(n\theta)$ we may write $$E(A)=N^{3}\int_{0}^{1}|S_{A}(\theta)|^{4}d\theta,$$ or alternatively $$E(A)=\frac{1}{N}\int_{0}^{1}\left|\sum_{n\leq N^{1/c}}e(\lfloor n^{c}\rfloor\theta)\right|^{4}d\theta.$$

Remark: I am not sure for what the value of $c$ the asymptotic breaks down, but it certainly does not hold with $c=2$.

Source Link
Eric Naslund
  • 11.4k
  • 1
  • 66
  • 106
Loading