Timeline for Change of groups for naive G-spectra
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 22, 2015 at 13:16 | vote | accept | David Barnes | ||
Oct 22, 2015 at 10:08 | comment | added | user51223 | To an inclusion of compact Lie groups $H<G$, a suitable transfer in the sense of Becker-Schultz as well as Mann-Miller-Miller, $t_H^G:BG^{ad_G+\alpha}\to BH^{ad_H+\alpha|_H}$ can be associated where $\alpha\to BG$ is some (virtual) vector bundle, and $ad_G$ is the adjoint bundle associated to the adjoint representation of $G$. Then, how far is the answer to the question ``to what extend does $t_H^G$ induce a surjection in homotopy groups/equivariant homotopy groups?'' from an answer to your question? | |
Oct 21, 2015 at 16:35 | answer | added | Tyler Lawson | timeline score: 8 | |
Oct 21, 2015 at 11:34 | comment | added | Tom Goodwillie | You had better be clear as to what the weak equivalences are: do they induce equivalences on fixed-point spectra? But either way I don't believe 1 is true. | |
Oct 21, 2015 at 11:14 | history | asked | David Barnes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |