Timeline for Terminology issue: meaning of 'ample class' ?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 4, 2010 at 2:13 | comment | added | Sean Tilson | +10 for Hailong | |
Apr 22, 2010 at 18:02 | comment | added | Hailong Dao | Dear Pete: I sure hope you will not restraint yourself (-:, because of the following: 1) nobody knows everything 2) experts may not answers all the questions and 3) it benefits everyone to see answers from a different perspective. Please keep on answering. | |
Apr 22, 2010 at 12:24 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 23 characters in body
|
Apr 22, 2010 at 4:36 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | By the way, with people like Ekedahl, Vistoli, BCnrd and VA lurking about, I feel a little silly answering algebraic geometry questions. [I am pretty good at algebraic geometry...for a number theorist.] Perhaps I should exercise more restraint. | |
Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | I mean the map which appears in the universal coefficient theorem for cohomology...which is indeed defined by functoriality. | |
Apr 22, 2010 at 4:28 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | What do you mean by "(universal coefficient)"? Isn't the map you want just the one given by functoriality? | |
Apr 22, 2010 at 3:53 | comment | added | Kevin H. Lin | Yeah, ok, nevermind. | |
Apr 22, 2010 at 3:33 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | Agreed. But for a line bundle, what else would it be? | |
Apr 22, 2010 at 3:17 | comment | added | Kevin H. Lin | This is the first Chern class, usually denoted $c_1$. | |
Apr 22, 2010 at 2:20 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 84 characters in body
|
Apr 22, 2010 at 2:15 | history | answered | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |