Timeline for First formulation of the Dedekind and Hasse-Weil conjectures
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2016 at 19:54 | answer | added | Franz Lemmermeyer | timeline score: 6 | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 17:43 | history | edited | Myshkin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 374 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2015 at 14:31 | history | edited | Myshkin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 521 characters in body
|
| Oct 18, 2015 at 12:19 | answer | added | anon | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 18, 2015 at 12:18 | history | edited | Myshkin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 79 characters in body; edited title
|
| Oct 18, 2015 at 12:16 | comment | added | Myshkin | @FrancoisZiegler You are right, thanks again! | |
| Oct 18, 2015 at 12:10 | comment | added | Francois Ziegler | Happy to help, I think it's fine if I leave it as a comment. Never ask two questions in one :-) | |
| Oct 18, 2015 at 11:56 | comment | added | Myshkin | @FrancoisZiegler That's exactly what I was looking for! If you want to put that as an answer, I can accept it and take the part regarding the Dedekind conjecture to another question. | |
| Oct 18, 2015 at 11:12 | comment | added | Francois Ziegler | That seems to have been oral. Lang (1995, p. 1302) writes: "In 1950, as far as I know, Hasse had not published his conjecture, but he did publish it in 1954; see his comments on the first page of [Ha 54]." There Hasse writes that he had given this problem to his late student Humbert "towards the end of the 1930s". | |
| Oct 18, 2015 at 8:34 | comment | added | Myshkin | @FrancoisZiegler Thanks, that's close! I guess what's I'm looking for is somwhere where Hasse might have written this down. | |
| Oct 18, 2015 at 2:49 | history | edited | KConrad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Oct 18, 2015 at 2:21 | answer | added | Vesselin Dimitrov | timeline score: 13 | |
| Oct 17, 2015 at 22:50 | comment | added | Francois Ziegler | Do you require much earlier than Weil Number-theory and algebraic geometry, Proc. Int. Cong. Math. 1950, vol. 2, pp. 90-100, which ends: "I should like to conclude with a brief discussion of a very interesting conjecture, due, I believe, to Hasse (...) we are thus led to consider the product of these zeta-functions for all $\mathfrak p$, which is precisely the function previously defined by Hasse, of which he conjectured that it can be continued analytically over the whole plane, that it is meromorphic, and that it satisfies a functional equation."? | |
| Oct 17, 2015 at 21:11 | history | asked | Myshkin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |