Timeline for How the idea of adjugate matrix has been designed? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2020 at 10:06 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jun 24, 2020 at 12:13 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2019 at 7:40 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Sep 12, 2019 at 10:57 | |||||
| Oct 18, 2015 at 16:05 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 20, 2015 at 19:53 | |||||
| Oct 11, 2015 at 0:40 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 13, 2015 at 15:41 | |||||
| Oct 10, 2015 at 3:48 | history | closed |
Qiaochu Yuan Yoav Kallus Neil Strickland Ryan Budney Christian Remling |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Oct 8, 2015 at 15:43 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Indeed. He reworked his research several times, with posts in 1890 and 1906. A copy of one of them can be found here: archive.org/details/theoryofdetermin01muiruoft . People were saying to him "Inter-net? Whereof speakest thou?", to which Muir calmly replied "Just wait." Gerhard "Clearly Ahead Of His Time" Paseman, 2015.10.08 | |
| Oct 8, 2015 at 3:02 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | François Dorais also posted an answer here: plus.google.com/+FrancoisDorais/posts/C6SBgvj5v8e | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 21:57 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | "Thomas Muir posted a history of determinants...." Posted? Really, @Gerhard? | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 21:26 | comment | added | Allen Knutson | (My answer linked above has no essential difference from Qiaochu's answer, linked directly above.) | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 21:23 | history | edited | Allen Knutson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 60 characters in body; edited title
|
| Oct 7, 2015 at 19:59 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 10, 2015 at 3:48 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 19:42 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | mathoverflow.net/a/89079/290 | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 19:09 | history | reopened |
Anton Geraschenko Joseph O'Rourke Suvrit Yemon Choi Benjamin Steinberg |
||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 19:08 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | I think the Wikipedia entry of Cramer's rule is quite accessible and well motivated (and relevant here). Also, Thomas Muir posted a history of determinants (which existed before matrix notation!) and their development. You can find both resources on the web. Also, the question could use an example of what shape is wanted for the answer: pointers to the literature, a copy of the Wikipedia article, a category theory or foundational approach, or something understood by someone with only one or two linear algebra courses behind them. Gerhard "Falls Into The Last Category" Paseman, 2015.10.07 | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 18:05 | history | edited | user9072 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typeset the formula
|
| Oct 7, 2015 at 18:01 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 18:59 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 18:01 | comment | added | Anton Geraschenko | I vote to reopen: meta.mathoverflow.net/a/2519/1 | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 12:19 | comment | added | Christian Stump | Allen Knutson parked his rephrasing of the question together with an answer at plus.google.com/+AllenKnutson/posts/LgLxgxsXNAT. | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 9:20 | history | closed |
Andreas Blass darij grinberg Alexey Ustinov Francesco Polizzi Stefan Kohl♦ |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 8:55 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | Try to look at the inverse matrix by finding the indeterminate entries with the Cramer's rule (which is rather old mathematics), and the matrix of cofactors appears quite naturally. That said, this is not a research question, so I vote to close. | |
| Oct 7, 2015 at 8:41 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Oct 7, 2015 at 8:14 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 9:20 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 7:42 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 8:10 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2015 at 7:40 | history | asked | Ráfagan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |