Timeline for Traces of operators in nuclear spaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2016 at 15:58 | history | edited | Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected typo
|
| Oct 6, 2015 at 21:55 | answer | added | J.L.R. | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 5, 2015 at 20:17 | comment | added | Jochen Wengenroth | The author of the book you mention is Hans Jarchow. | |
| Oct 5, 2015 at 20:16 | answer | added | Jochen Wengenroth | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 16:31 | comment | added | J.L.R. | The first equality does not hold as projective tensor products do not commute with direct sums. | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 16:23 | comment | added | Sergei Akbarov | Something is strange for me here... For a locally convex space $X$ let us denote by $X^{\mathbb N}$ and $X_{\mathbb N}$ the direct product and the locally convex sum of contable copies of $X$. Then I would think that $({\mathbb R}^{\mathbb N})'_{\beta}\otimes_{\pi}{\mathbb R}^{\mathbb N}=({\mathbb R}^{\mathbb N})_{\mathbb N}\ne({\mathbb R}_{\mathbb N})^{\mathbb N}=L_{\beta}({\mathbb R}^{\mathbb N})$. | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 16:11 | comment | added | J.L.R. | That might be, but for Nuclear Frechet Spaces and the projective tensor product, it holds. | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 15:34 | comment | added | Sergei Akbarov | In the stereotype world, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotype_space, this equality is not true: ${\mathbb R}_{\mathbb N}\circledast {\mathbb R}^{\mathbb N}\ne {\mathcal L}({\mathbb R}^{\mathbb N})$. | |
| Oct 4, 2015 at 14:37 | history | edited | J.L.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body; edited body
|
| Oct 4, 2015 at 13:57 | history | edited | Myshkin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
latex included, minor formatting, tag
|
| Oct 4, 2015 at 13:31 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 4, 2015 at 13:57 | |||||
| Oct 4, 2015 at 13:28 | history | asked | J.L.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |