Skip to main content
added 42 characters in body
Source Link
Gottfried Helms
  • 5.3k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 38

Although the following does not provide another proof (perhaps it is possiblypossible to attempt one on this basis) I found it nice to see the following pictures.
Let's take from the series $f(x) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^k \over \sqrt{k!}}$ the following variants in the same spirit as we have the hyperbolic and trigonometric series from the exponential-series: $$\begin{array}{} \exp_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& f(x) \\ \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& { \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)\over \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) } \\ \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \end{array}$$$$\begin{array}{} \small \exp_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& f(x) \\ \small \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \small \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \small \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& { \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)\over \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) } \\ \small \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \small \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \end{array}$$ The answer to your question is equivalent to say, that always (="for real $x$")

  • $\small \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)$ is larger than $\small \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) $ $\qquad \qquad$ or that
  • $\small \mid \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) \mid \lt 1$

To illustrate this I've plotted the $\sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ and $\cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$-curves:

![bild1][1]

This gives surely an extremely familiar impression...

The $\tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$-curve looks completely familiar too: ![bild2][2]

and the image suggests, that indeed the absolute value of $\small \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) $ very likely is smaller than $1$ for all real $x$.


However, things are different for the $\sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ and $\cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ curves - they deviate strongly from the nicely periodic common trigonometric functions:

![bild3][3]

and combined they do not give a circle, but some ugly thing, strongly distorted (y-axis by $\small \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{ \,} }(\phi)$, x-axis by $\small \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{ \,} }(\phi)$, $\phi$ from $-5$ to $+5$) :

![bild4][4]


[1]: https://i.sstatic.net/zKZ6I.png [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/DT4At.png [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/yiYpF.png [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/YZSCk.png

Although the following does not provide another proof (perhaps it is possibly to attempt one on this basis) I found it nice to see the following pictures.
Let's take from the series $f(x) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^k \over \sqrt{k!}}$ the following variants in the same spirit as we have the hyperbolic and trigonometric series from the exponential-series: $$\begin{array}{} \exp_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& f(x) \\ \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& { \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)\over \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) } \\ \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \end{array}$$ The answer to your question is equivalent to say, that always (="for real $x$")

  • $\small \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)$ is larger than $\small \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) $ $\qquad \qquad$ or that
  • $\small \mid \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) \mid \lt 1$

To illustrate this I've plotted the $\sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ and $\cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$-curves:

![bild1][1]

This gives surely an extremely familiar impression...

The $\tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$-curve looks completely familiar too: ![bild2][2]

and the image suggests, that indeed the absolute value of $\small \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) $ very likely is smaller than $1$ for all real $x$.


However, things are different for the $\sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ and $\cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ curves - they deviate strongly from the nicely periodic common trigonometric functions:

![bild3][3]

and combined they do not give a circle, but some ugly thing, strongly distorted (y-axis by $\small \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{ \,} }(\phi)$, x-axis by $\small \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{ \,} }(\phi)$, $\phi$ from $-5$ to $+5$) :

![bild4][4]


[1]: https://i.sstatic.net/zKZ6I.png [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/DT4At.png [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/yiYpF.png [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/YZSCk.png

Although the following does not provide another proof (perhaps it is possible to attempt one on this basis) I found it nice to see the following pictures.
Let's take from the series $f(x) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^k \over \sqrt{k!}}$ the following variants in the same spirit as we have the hyperbolic and trigonometric series from the exponential-series: $$\begin{array}{} \small \exp_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& f(x) \\ \small \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \small \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \small \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& { \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)\over \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) } \\ \small \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \small \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \end{array}$$ The answer to your question is equivalent to say, that always (="for real $x$")

  • $\small \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)$ is larger than $\small \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) $ $\qquad \qquad$ or that
  • $\small \mid \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) \mid \lt 1$

To illustrate this I've plotted the $\sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ and $\cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$-curves:

![bild1][1]

This gives surely an extremely familiar impression...

The $\tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$-curve looks completely familiar too: ![bild2][2]

and the image suggests, that indeed the absolute value of $\small \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) $ very likely is smaller than $1$ for all real $x$.


However, things are different for the $\sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ and $\cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ curves - they deviate strongly from the nicely periodic common trigonometric functions:

![bild3][3]

and combined they do not give a circle, but some ugly thing, strongly distorted (y-axis by $\small \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{ \,} }(\phi)$, x-axis by $\small \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{ \,} }(\phi)$, $\phi$ from $-5$ to $+5$) :

![bild4][4]


[1]: https://i.sstatic.net/zKZ6I.png [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/DT4At.png [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/yiYpF.png [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/YZSCk.png
Source Link
Gottfried Helms
  • 5.3k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 38

Although the following does not provide another proof (perhaps it is possibly to attempt one on this basis) I found it nice to see the following pictures.
Let's take from the series $f(x) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^k \over \sqrt{k!}}$ the following variants in the same spirit as we have the hyperbolic and trigonometric series from the exponential-series: $$\begin{array}{} \exp_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& f(x) \\ \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& { \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)\over \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) } \\ \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k} \over \sqrt{(2k)!}} \\ \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k {x^{2k+1} \over \sqrt{(2k+1)!}} \\ \end{array}$$ The answer to your question is equivalent to say, that always (="for real $x$")

  • $\small \cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x)$ is larger than $\small \sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) $ $\qquad \qquad$ or that
  • $\small \mid \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) \mid \lt 1$

To illustrate this I've plotted the $\sinh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ and $\cosh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$-curves:

![bild1][1]

This gives surely an extremely familiar impression...

The $\tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$-curve looks completely familiar too: ![bild2][2]

and the image suggests, that indeed the absolute value of $\small \tanh_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}(x) $ very likely is smaller than $1$ for all real $x$.


However, things are different for the $\sin_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ and $\cos_{\tiny \sqrt{\,}}$ curves - they deviate strongly from the nicely periodic common trigonometric functions:

![bild3][3]

and combined they do not give a circle, but some ugly thing, strongly distorted (y-axis by $\small \cos_{\tiny \sqrt{ \,} }(\phi)$, x-axis by $\small \sin_{\tiny \sqrt{ \,} }(\phi)$, $\phi$ from $-5$ to $+5$) :

![bild4][4]


[1]: https://i.sstatic.net/zKZ6I.png [2]: https://i.sstatic.net/DT4At.png [3]: https://i.sstatic.net/yiYpF.png [4]: https://i.sstatic.net/YZSCk.png