Timeline for Grothendieck problem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2015 at 17:08 | comment | added | Mary Star | I am reading the proof of Grothendieck's problem for differential equations of first order, but I am facing some difficulties to understand it... Could you take a look at it? math.stackexchange.com/questions/1548963/… | |
| S Oct 12, 2015 at 4:06 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 12, 2015 at 4:06 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Oct 8, 2015 at 18:48 | comment | added | Vesselin Dimitrov | D. and G. Chudnovsky have solved other cases by elementary methods of diophantine approximations (Pade approximants). Chambert-Loir's paper is probably the best place to start on this; then you may look into the original papers by the Chudnovskys. | |
| Oct 8, 2015 at 18:46 | comment | added | Vesselin Dimitrov | The information on the wikipedia link is quite good. There are a few other references that I would add, notably Andre's book "G-functions and Geometry" and a couple of papers by D. and G. Chudnovsky, but they can all be found in the bibliography of, say, Chambert-Loir's paper linked to there. The list is then pretty much exhaustive, and it is up to you what to get out of it. (What kind of information do you look for? Do you for instance have the algebro-geometric background to follow Katz's Inventiones paper that contains the proof of the conjecture in the case of a Picard-Fuchs equation?) | |
| S Oct 4, 2015 at 2:35 | history | bounty started | Mary Star | ||
| S Oct 4, 2015 at 2:35 | history | notice added | Mary Star | Draw attention | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 19:57 | comment | added | Mary Star | What book would you suggest me to read to get more information about it? | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 15:31 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @JasonStarr Looks identical, actually... | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 10:14 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 1, 2015 at 13:38 | |||||
| Oct 1, 2015 at 10:10 | comment | added | Jason Starr | I cannot say immediately that your formulation is the same as the standard formulation of the Grothendieck-Katz conjecture, but they look quite similar. | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 10:05 | comment | added | Mary Star | I added the statement of the problem I am reffering to. Is that the Grothendieck-Katz conjecture? @JasonStarr | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 10:04 | history | edited | Mary Star | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 503 characters in body
|
| Oct 1, 2015 at 9:56 | comment | added | Jason Starr | Are you talking about the Grothendieck-Katz conjecture? Here is the link to the Wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…. | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 9:51 | history | asked | Mary Star | CC BY-SA 3.0 |