Skip to main content
fixed the link to make it more visible
Source Link
Robert Bryant
  • 108.4k
  • 8
  • 340
  • 453

No. Consider the case of an ellipsoid with three distinct axes, and remove the four umbilic points. Then you cannot find such vector fields on a (punctured) neighborhood of the deleted umbilics. Have a look at this reference on umbilics reference and try drawing the vector field on such a punctured neighborhood, and you'll see why.

No. Consider the case of an ellipsoid with three distinct axes, and remove the four umbilic points. Then you cannot find such vector fields on a (punctured) neighborhood of the deleted umbilics. Have a look at this reference and try drawing the vector field on such a punctured neighborhood, and you'll see why.

No. Consider the case of an ellipsoid with three distinct axes, and remove the four umbilic points. Then you cannot find such vector fields on a (punctured) neighborhood of the deleted umbilics. Have a look at this reference on umbilics and try drawing the vector field on such a punctured neighborhood, and you'll see why.

Source Link
Robert Bryant
  • 108.4k
  • 8
  • 340
  • 453

No. Consider the case of an ellipsoid with three distinct axes, and remove the four umbilic points. Then you cannot find such vector fields on a (punctured) neighborhood of the deleted umbilics. Have a look at this reference and try drawing the vector field on such a punctured neighborhood, and you'll see why.