Timeline for Two strengthenings of "strong measure zero"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 4:18 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | Thank you very much for this answer! I've accepted, and asked a new question expanding on the rest of this question: mathoverflow.net/questions/220687/…. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 3:47 | vote | accept | Noah Schweber | ||
| Sep 27, 2015 at 1:34 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | Something I missed at first glance, which I'm mentioning here because it might be interesting to others: this argument is essentially the same as the proof that if Empty has a winning strategy in the perfect set game for $X$, then $X$ is countable. | |
| Sep 26, 2015 at 23:36 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | This is very nice! It doesn't obviously extend to the continuously strong measure zero case, though, does it? The natural game to play in that case would be: player I plays epsilons, player II plays intervals, but is allowed to pass. But in that game, many reals can be killed at a given stage, so the analysis seems to break down. Or am I missing something? | |
| Sep 26, 2015 at 9:53 | history | answered | Andreas Blass | CC BY-SA 3.0 |