Timeline for Basic questions about simplicial commutative rings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2015 at 8:59 | vote | accept | user78856 | ||
| Sep 28, 2015 at 8:49 | history | edited | user78856 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body
|
| Sep 25, 2015 at 16:41 | history | edited | David White | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Sep 25, 2015 at 16:29 | answer | added | David White | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 25, 2015 at 14:44 | comment | added | Zhen Lin | 1. Not a question. 2. Yes. 3. Yes. 4. Yes. However, these are somehow the wrong questions to ask – simplicial modules already have a built-in notion of weak equivalence, and this is ignored if you treat it as an abelian category. It is akin to taking the category of chain complexes as an abelian category in its own right. | |
| Sep 25, 2015 at 13:33 | history | asked | user78856 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |