Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 24, 2015 at 23:39 answer added David Wood timeline score: 3
Sep 24, 2015 at 14:54 comment added Pavan Sangha Is there a mistake in the paper?
Sep 24, 2015 at 14:51 comment added Pavan Sangha Hi guys, just make sure i haven't misstated Valiant's result here is the paper where i found it stated ac.els-cdn.com/0012365X9090358O/… it's on page 4 of the document under lemma 2.1. And yes the paper i'm referring to is the one mentioned above.
Sep 24, 2015 at 14:27 comment added Tony Huynh @j.c. It is likely Universality Considerations in VLSI Circuits computer.org/csdl/trans/tc/1981/02/06312176.pdf
Sep 24, 2015 at 14:16 comment added j.c. Which paper are you reading?
Sep 24, 2015 at 14:04 answer added Tony Huynh timeline score: 9
Sep 24, 2015 at 12:38 answer added Igor Rivin timeline score: 0
Sep 24, 2015 at 12:18 comment added Louis Deaett By some sort of continuity argument, one can always take the points of a planar embedding to be in $\mathbb Q \times \mathbb Q$, and then scale everything up so that the coordinates will all be integers. So the $O(|V|)$ bound would really seem to be the essential aspect of the result.
Sep 24, 2015 at 10:43 history asked Pavan Sangha CC BY-SA 3.0