Timeline for Sets not containing the vertices of unit triangles (Question posed by Erdős)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Sep 24, 2015 at 3:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 25, 2015 at 12:18 | |||||
| Sep 18, 2015 at 3:39 | answer | added | Xiaoyu He | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 17:53 | comment | added | Jason Eliot | Yes, even if measurable is not enough, it should be no problem. In the original post it is mentioned that we can equivalently go to compact convex sets. Thank you. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 3:47 | comment | added | Xiaoyu He | Your equivalence argument is not too hard to fix by first going to compact convex sets and then packing with circles as in the answer from the previous question. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 3:25 | comment | added | Xiaoyu He | (Lebesgue) measurable sets with positive measure do not necessarily contain any disks with positive radius at all, e.g. unit disk - rational points. Nevertheless your circle problem seems interesting in its own right. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 17, 2015 at 11:52 | |||||
| Sep 17, 2015 at 2:18 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 17, 2015 at 5:36 | |||||
| Sep 17, 2015 at 2:13 | history | asked | Jason Eliot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |