Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 8, 2015 at 12:55 vote accept user32422
Sep 8, 2015 at 12:44 answer added Andreas Thom timeline score: 1
Sep 8, 2015 at 12:42 comment added Carlo Beenakker OK, I've edited the title to more accurately correspond to your question (changed "trace" into "sum of absolute value of eigenvalues")
Sep 8, 2015 at 12:41 history edited Carlo Beenakker CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected the title in view of the comment of the OP of what is actually the question
Sep 8, 2015 at 12:27 comment added user32422 @Carlo Beenakker I've corrected my question. I don't know the sum of their absolute values and neither does I want to know the sum of reals. I'm interested in the former. The problem is: almost everything, what I know about the matrix, comes from concepts in physics. The question is probably not suited for this site. I had not given the topic enough thought.
Sep 8, 2015 at 11:59 history edited user32422 CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments
Sep 8, 2015 at 11:29 comment added Carlo Beenakker so it's like asking what you can say about the sum of reals when you know the sum of their absolute values; the latter will be an upper bound to the former, but I can't imagine you can lower that.
Sep 8, 2015 at 11:01 history edited user32422 CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments
Sep 8, 2015 at 10:44 history edited user32422 CC BY-SA 3.0
Comments
Sep 8, 2015 at 10:32 comment added user32422 Sorry, it's not that clear. The matrix is not given. But due to physical constraints I have an upper bound for the biggest matrix element. Also, I have a good estimate for the average absolute value of a matrix element.
Sep 8, 2015 at 10:15 comment added Carlo Beenakker I'm a bit confused: if the matrix is given, you just sum the diagonal elements to get the trace, what "bound" on the trace would you want?
Sep 8, 2015 at 9:54 review First posts
Sep 8, 2015 at 9:58
Sep 8, 2015 at 9:51 history asked user32422 CC BY-SA 3.0