Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 8, 2015 at 17:52 vote accept David Loeffler
Sep 8, 2015 at 15:28 answer added François Brunault timeline score: 3
Sep 8, 2015 at 10:18 comment added David Loeffler No, for Hida $\chi$ is an arbitrary Dirichlet character; I'm taking $\chi = 1$ in his notation. The point is that Hida's definition of $D_\ell(X)$ has a factor of $\psi'\psi_P(\ell)^{-1}$ which is not there in my definition (where $\psi' \psi_P$ is Hida's notation for the nebentypus of $f$).
Sep 8, 2015 at 10:15 comment added kantelope Reading Hida, is there any link between $\chi$ at the top of page 96 and anything previous? You seem to interpret it as the character of the form, but I do not see this explicitly.
Sep 8, 2015 at 9:50 comment added David Loeffler Magma agrees with me and disagrees with Hida, then. (Magma only seems to give critical values in the right half of the $s$-plane, which is weird; I can't find any description of the CriticalPoints function in the Magma docs, so it's not clear if this is intended behaviour or a bug.)
Sep 8, 2015 at 9:47 comment added kantelope Magma claims (I know not how) that for $k=5$, the critical points are 6,8, and when I twist it by some character $\epsilon_f^{-1}$ who has $\epsilon(-1)=-1$, then they become 5,7.
Sep 8, 2015 at 9:34 comment added David Loeffler For $k$ even there is no difference between Hida's statement and my computations. The issue is only for $k$ odd.
Sep 8, 2015 at 9:33 comment added kantelope What is the answer for $k=2$? Here $s=2$ is critical.
Sep 8, 2015 at 9:24 history asked David Loeffler CC BY-SA 3.0