Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Oct 8, 2015 at 10:23 comment added sure Yet, the internal natural transformations are not natural (as far as I know, even if you try to code them as modifications between 2-cats). So while the category of internal categories in C forms a 2-category, it seems that there is no functorial way to see them as a representation of a syntactic 2-category. Thus, the isomorphism of internal functors is not functorial, and therefore not natural.
Oct 8, 2015 at 10:23 comment added sure I would like to support @user80028's view that the good question is about trying to understand what kind of construction is functorial. There is a clear example with 2-category theory: if C is a category, an internal category to C is just a left exact functor from the sketch of an (internal) category to C. Now, an internal functor between these categories is just a natural transformation between the previous functors.
Oct 8, 2015 at 9:06 comment added Fernando Muro @SimonHenry nice observation which leads to another tautological answer to the original question, this time positive. Going a little bit further, if we remove non-identity morphisms from a given category, any construction becomes natural.
Oct 8, 2015 at 8:47 comment added Simon Henry The two construction are functorial on isomorphisms and the isomorphism between then is a natural transformation in this sense. But of course this kind of general principle only apply to isomorphism...
Sep 8, 2015 at 8:54 review Late answers
Sep 8, 2015 at 8:57
Sep 8, 2015 at 8:34 review First posts
Sep 8, 2015 at 8:57
Sep 8, 2015 at 8:33 history answered user80028 CC BY-SA 3.0