Timeline for Questions about $\mathbb{C}[G/U^-]$ and $\mathbb{C}[B]$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 7, 2015 at 12:39 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | @VítTuček The description in the original posting. This wasn't explicitly said, but if you follow the argument through, the isomorphism $\mathbb C[G/U_-]\cong \oplus_{\lambda}V_{\lambda}^*$ is given by the functions $f_x$ for $x$ in $V_{\lambda}$. | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 20:21 | comment | added | Vít Tuček | So $\lambda$ runs through all possible weights and the isomorphism $\bigoplus_{h\in S} M_\lambda^* \to \mathbb{C}[B]$ is an isomorphism of $B$-modules? How do you make the connection to $G/U_{-}$? | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:39 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | @DavidSpeyer Those aren't quite the conventions I used, but up to some minus signs, yes. | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:38 | history | edited | Ben Webster♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 299 characters in body
|
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:32 | comment | added | David E Speyer | Thanks Ben! And, just for the record, the maximal finite dimensional subrep of $M_{\lambda}^{\ast}$ is $V_{\lambda}^{\ast}$ if $\lambda$ is dominant, and $0$ otherwise, right? | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:28 | history | answered | Ben Webster♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |