Timeline for An introduction to Macdonald polynomials other (better?!) than SFHP
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 7, 2015 at 15:51 | vote | accept | Igor Makhlin | ||
Sep 6, 2015 at 19:08 | comment | added | Igor Makhlin | @DimaPasechnik I've read through fair portions of both Zelevinsky's translation and Oxford's second edition. I must say I haven't felt much of a difference. I guess my problems with the text run deeper than what might change from one edition to the next. In a sense, it gives the feeling that what I'm reading is much closer to a research article than to a textbook. (This, of course, is for the specific reason of much of the material being Macdonald's original results.) | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:54 | comment | added | Igor Makhlin | @PerAlexandersson Hi! Thanks for taking interest in my work and my MO questions! No, I haven't come across Haglund's book before, will certainly have a look. | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:35 | answer | added | Christian Stump | timeline score: 10 | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:06 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | I can only say that the 2nd edition of SFHP is more readable, so if you tried the 1st one (the one translated into Russian) then you might find the 2nd one nicer. | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:44 | history | edited | Todd Trimble | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
wrote out the acronym SFHP; added a link
|
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:37 | comment | added | Matt Samuel | I sympathize. I was given the book as an undergraduate and I was like "wtf?" So I did Schubert calculus instead. | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:29 | comment | added | Per Alexandersson | Oh, you are that Igor! I read your paper on Hall-Littlewood polynomials from Brions formula. It's quite nice! Anyway, have you had a look at Jim's book on qt-Catalan numbers? math.upenn.edu/~jhaglund It has a chapter in the end about Macdonald polynomials. | |
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:12 | history | asked | Igor Makhlin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |