Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 7, 2015 at 15:51 vote accept Igor Makhlin
Sep 6, 2015 at 19:08 comment added Igor Makhlin @DimaPasechnik I've read through fair portions of both Zelevinsky's translation and Oxford's second edition. I must say I haven't felt much of a difference. I guess my problems with the text run deeper than what might change from one edition to the next. In a sense, it gives the feeling that what I'm reading is much closer to a research article than to a textbook. (This, of course, is for the specific reason of much of the material being Macdonald's original results.)
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:54 comment added Igor Makhlin @PerAlexandersson Hi! Thanks for taking interest in my work and my MO questions! No, I haven't come across Haglund's book before, will certainly have a look.
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:35 answer added Christian Stump timeline score: 10
Sep 6, 2015 at 18:06 comment added Dima Pasechnik I can only say that the 2nd edition of SFHP is more readable, so if you tried the 1st one (the one translated into Russian) then you might find the 2nd one nicer.
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:44 history edited Todd Trimble CC BY-SA 3.0
wrote out the acronym SFHP; added a link
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:37 comment added Matt Samuel I sympathize. I was given the book as an undergraduate and I was like "wtf?" So I did Schubert calculus instead.
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:29 comment added Per Alexandersson Oh, you are that Igor! I read your paper on Hall-Littlewood polynomials from Brions formula. It's quite nice! Anyway, have you had a look at Jim's book on qt-Catalan numbers? math.upenn.edu/~jhaglund It has a chapter in the end about Macdonald polynomials.
Sep 6, 2015 at 17:12 history asked Igor Makhlin CC BY-SA 3.0