Skip to main content
deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Sean Tilson
  • 3.7k
  • 1
  • 39
  • 40

algebraic geometry is not my field at all, but it seems like this is a bit of an answer, and i don't really know the details but maybe someone can fill them in. TThre zariskiThe Zariski topology is not good for doing homotopy theory. I have heard this at many seminars, specifically from someone who does motivic homotopy theory. So from that perspective it is not the right topology, but i can only say that i have heard this not that i understand why the zariskiZariski topology is bad. I guess just naively it seems like it would be pretty hard doing homotopy theory on "any" line where your only open sets are finite complements.

algebraic geometry is not my field at all, but it seems like this is a bit of an answer, and i don't really know the details but maybe someone can fill them in. TThre zariski topology is not good for doing homotopy theory. I have heard this at many seminars, specifically from someone who does motivic homotopy theory. So from that perspective it is not the right topology, but i can only say that i have heard this not that i understand why the zariski topology is bad. I guess just naively it seems like it would be pretty hard doing homotopy theory on "any" line where your only open sets are finite complements.

algebraic geometry is not my field at all, but it seems like this is a bit of an answer, and i don't really know the details but maybe someone can fill them in. The Zariski topology is not good for doing homotopy theory. I have heard this at many seminars, specifically from someone who does motivic homotopy theory. So from that perspective it is not the right topology, but i can only say that i have heard this not that i understand why the Zariski topology is bad. I guess just naively it seems like it would be pretty hard doing homotopy theory on "any" line where your only open sets are finite complements.

Post Made Community Wiki
Source Link
Sean Tilson
  • 3.7k
  • 1
  • 39
  • 40

algebraic geometry is not my field at all, but it seems like this is a bit of an answer, and i don't really know the details but maybe someone can fill them in. TThre zariski topology is not good for doing homotopy theory. I have heard this at many seminars, specifically from someone who does motivic homotopy theory. So from that perspective it is not the right topology, but i can only say that i have heard this not that i understand why the zariski topology is bad. I guess just naively it seems like it would be pretty hard doing homotopy theory on "any" line where your only open sets are finite complements.