Timeline for in the analytic category, finite morphisms are open maps?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2010 at 0:59 | answer | added | Sándor Kovács | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 11, 2010 at 19:53 | answer | added | kaddar | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 17, 2010 at 17:47 | comment | added | BCnrd | For finiteness, your proposed criterion only implies the "right" notion locally on source and target (think of an open embedding). The very self-contained book "Coherent Analytic Sheaves" answers these (in the affirmative) and many other related questions. (A more transparent definition of finiteness in the connected manifold setting is being either proper with finite fibers or being "classified" by a coherent sheaf of $O_Y$-algebras that is locally free of finite rank; equivalences among possible definitions of analytic finiteness are much deeper than in the algebraic theory.) | |
| Apr 17, 2010 at 17:05 | history | asked | Wayne | CC BY-SA 2.5 |