Skip to main content
Post Undeleted by Sungjin Kim
deleted 82 characters in body
Source Link
Sungjin Kim
  • 3.3k
  • 25
  • 28

In thisthe paper

On the Order of mineFinitely Generated Subgroups of $\mathbb{Q}^{*}$ (not yet published)mod :$p$) and Divisors of http://www.math.ucla.edu/~i707107/SJK_TmImprovement.pdf$p-1$, Journal of Number Theory 57, pp. 207-222

I prove thatby F. Pappalardi,

Let $a>1$ non-square. Denote by $l_a(p)$ thethe multiplicative order of $a$ modulo $p$. Then we have for some positive $\gamma$, $$ \sum_{p<x} \frac{1}{l_a(p)} \leq \left(\frac{2}{\pi}\sqrt{6\log a} +o(1)\right)\frac{\sqrt{x}}{\log x}.$$

using Z. Engberg's upper bound

$$\sum_{l_a(p)=d} 1 \leq \frac{ \varphi(d)\log a}{2\log d} + O\left(\frac{d\log\log d}{(\log d)^2}\right).$$$$ \sum_{p<x} \frac{1}{l_a(p)} \ll \frac{\sqrt{x}}{(\log x)^{1+\gamma}}.$$

It seems that breaking $\sqrt x$ on the upper bound is very difficult.

If your assertion is true, then the upper bound would have $N \log\log x$ which is way beyond the upper bound of mine$\sqrt x / (\log x)^{1+\gamma}$.

In this paper of mine (not yet published) : http://www.math.ucla.edu/~i707107/SJK_TmImprovement.pdf

I prove that

Let $a>1$. Denote by $l_a(p)$ the multiplicative order of $a$ modulo $p$. Then we have $$ \sum_{p<x} \frac{1}{l_a(p)} \leq \left(\frac{2}{\pi}\sqrt{6\log a} +o(1)\right)\frac{\sqrt{x}}{\log x}.$$

using Z. Engberg's upper bound

$$\sum_{l_a(p)=d} 1 \leq \frac{ \varphi(d)\log a}{2\log d} + O\left(\frac{d\log\log d}{(\log d)^2}\right).$$

It seems that breaking $\sqrt x$ on the upper bound is very difficult.

If your assertion is true, then the upper bound would have $N \log\log x$ which is way beyond the upper bound of mine.

In the paper

On the Order of Finitely Generated Subgroups of $\mathbb{Q}^{*}$ (mod $p$) and Divisors of $p-1$, Journal of Number Theory 57, pp. 207-222

by F. Pappalardi,

Let $a>1$ non-square. Denote by $l_a(p)$ the multiplicative order of $a$ modulo $p$. Then we have for some positive $\gamma$, $$ \sum_{p<x} \frac{1}{l_a(p)} \ll \frac{\sqrt{x}}{(\log x)^{1+\gamma}}.$$

It seems that breaking $\sqrt x$ on the upper bound is very difficult.

If your assertion is true, then the upper bound would have $N \log\log x$ which is way beyond the upper bound $\sqrt x / (\log x)^{1+\gamma}$.

Post Deleted by Sungjin Kim
Source Link
Sungjin Kim
  • 3.3k
  • 25
  • 28

In this paper of mine (not yet published) : http://www.math.ucla.edu/~i707107/SJK_TmImprovement.pdf

I prove that

Let $a>1$. Denote by $l_a(p)$ the multiplicative order of $a$ modulo $p$. Then we have $$ \sum_{p<x} \frac{1}{l_a(p)} \leq \left(\frac{2}{\pi}\sqrt{6\log a} +o(1)\right)\frac{\sqrt{x}}{\log x}.$$

using Z. Engberg's upper bound

$$\sum_{l_a(p)=d} 1 \leq \frac{ \varphi(d)\log a}{2\log d} + O\left(\frac{d\log\log d}{(\log d)^2}\right).$$

It seems that breaking $\sqrt x$ on the upper bound is very difficult.

If your assertion is true, then the upper bound would have $N \log\log x$ which is way beyond the upper bound of mine.