Timeline for When is a blow-up non-singular?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2022 at 9:36 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 117 characters in body
|
| S Nov 5, 2018 at 21:10 | history | suggested | user2831784 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
updated link
|
| Nov 5, 2018 at 18:17 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 5, 2018 at 21:10 | |||||
| Nov 3, 2010 at 5:31 | vote | accept | jlk | ||
| Apr 27, 2010 at 16:10 | comment | added | jlk | @Hailong Dao, Thanks! My previous comment summarizing the paper was inaccurate. The authors prove that if $Z$ is a complete intersection, then the blow-up along $Z$ is non-singular iff $Z$ is non-singular (Thm 2.1). They give similar results for other special cases. For example, they prove that the blow-up of $A^3$ along a non-degenerate monomial curve is singular (Cor. 3.3). They also have results about blowing up determinantal loci. | |
| Apr 16, 2010 at 22:58 | vote | accept | jlk | ||
| Nov 3, 2010 at 5:31 | |||||
| Apr 16, 2010 at 17:03 | history | answered | Hailong Dao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |