Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Sep 1, 2015 at 3:33 history edited Pham Hung Quy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 105 characters in body
Sep 1, 2015 at 2:57 history edited Pham Hung Quy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 180 characters in body
S Aug 31, 2015 at 19:47 history suggested Thomas Kahle CC BY-SA 3.0
Streamline many small details, fix typos, make proof understandable to me.
Aug 31, 2015 at 19:35 vote accept Thomas Kahle
Aug 31, 2015 at 19:35 comment added Thomas Kahle Thank you! I've taken the liberty to edit your proof a little. As you say, it's not short, but quite elementary. Nice.
Aug 31, 2015 at 19:34 review Suggested edits
S Aug 31, 2015 at 19:47
Aug 31, 2015 at 10:44 comment added Pham Hung Quy I edited my answer more detail (add a Fact).
Aug 31, 2015 at 10:43 history edited Pham Hung Quy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 695 characters in body
Aug 31, 2015 at 8:09 comment added Thomas Kahle Thank you for your answer. There are a number of things that I don't understand yet. Can you please explain: Why can you saturate at X ("since X is indeterminate")? In Claim 1, are you saying that you want to choose f,g so that Claim 1 is satisfied? What do you mean by "then we replace"/why can you replace $f$? And then David Lamperts comment. It would be great if you could fill in some more detail. Thanks!
Aug 28, 2015 at 19:24 history edited Pham Hung Quy CC BY-SA 3.0
added 9 characters in body
Aug 28, 2015 at 19:15 comment added David Lampert Nice! Just a minor clarification at the end: $g'=X^{m-m'}g'', (f) \cap (g'') \neq 0$ by minimality, $uf=vg'', X^{m-m'}uf=v(g-f)$, then finish as above.
Aug 28, 2015 at 18:40 history answered Pham Hung Quy CC BY-SA 3.0