Skip to main content
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

As pointed out by Gerry Myerson in the answer to this questionthis question, you cannot even define zeta for negative real parts without using the functional equation, so no.

As pointed out by Gerry Myerson in the answer to this question, you cannot even define zeta for negative real parts without using the functional equation, so no.

As pointed out by Gerry Myerson in the answer to this question, you cannot even define zeta for negative real parts without using the functional equation, so no.

Source Link
Igor Rivin
  • 96.4k
  • 11
  • 153
  • 366

As pointed out by Gerry Myerson in the answer to this question, you cannot even define zeta for negative real parts without using the functional equation, so no.