Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots in the interior of unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalence relation: We say two polynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

 

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The reason is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots in the interior of unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalence relation: We say two polynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

 

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The reason is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots in the interior of unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalence relation: We say two polynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The reason is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by Ali Taghavi
Bounty Ended with Fedor Petrov's answer chosen by Ali Taghavi

An equivalentequivalence relation on the space of polynomials in one complex variable

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots in the interior of unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalentequivalence relation: We say two polynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The resaonreason is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

An equivalent relation on the space of polynomials in one complex variable

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots in the interior of unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalent relation: We say two polynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The resaon is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

An equivalence relation on the space of polynomials in one complex variable

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots in the interior of unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalence relation: We say two polynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The reason is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

Notice added Authoritative reference needed by Ali Taghavi
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Ali Taghavi
added 12 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots insidein the interior of unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalent relation: We say two poynomialspolynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The resaon is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots inside unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalent relation: We say two poynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The resaon is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

Let $P(z)$ be a polynomial with complex variable $z$. We consider the following distribution for the roots of $P(z)=0$: the distribution is a triple $(n_{1},n_{2},n_{3})$ where these integers are the number of roots in the interior of unite circle, on the unit circle and out of unit disc, respectively.

$\ell^{2}$ is the Hilbert space of all square sumable sequence of complex numbers. $S_1$ is the shift operator on $\ell^{2}.$

The equivalent relation: We say two polynomials $P,Q$ are equivalent if $P(S_1)$ is conjugate to $Q(S_1)$ via an invertible operator in $B(\ell^{2})$.

Assume that $P,Q$ are two equivalent polynomials:

1.Must they have the same degree?

2.Must they have the same root distribution?

The motivation for the second question is that when $P,Q$ have the same degree and $P$ has $(n_{1},0,n_{3})$ distribution, then $Q$ has the same distribution as $P$. The resaon is that $P(S_1)$ is a Fredhom operator of index $-n_1$. Obviously this property is invariant under conjucacy. So $Q$ has the same root distribution.

added 29 characters in body
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
added 164 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading
Source Link
Ali Taghavi
  • 356
  • 8
  • 31
  • 123
Loading