Timeline for No Hilbert space can have countable Hamel basis without using Baire's Category theorem [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 15:13 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Aug 20, 2015 at 15:31 | |||||
| Aug 20, 2015 at 14:48 | history | edited | Sosha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 14:10 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | What Yemon is saying in his previous comment is that this sounds like a homework assignment. If that is the case, then please be aware that we don't discuss HW at this site. | |
| S Aug 20, 2015 at 14:08 | history | unlocked | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 20, 2015 at 14:08 | history | locked | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 20, 2015 at 14:08 | history | closed |
Eric Wofsey Marco Golla Alex Degtyarev Boris Bukh Yoav Kallus |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 13:18 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | The language "I have to prove" means, to me, a need or a demand. This makes it sound like an assigned task. Most BC arguments can be converted to sliding hump arguments, anyway | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 13:09 | answer | added | Simon Henry | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 12:59 | comment | added | Sosha | @YemonChoi: I think it is pretty straightforward what I mean here. I want to know an alternate proof. | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 12:53 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 20, 2015 at 14:08 | |||||
| Aug 20, 2015 at 12:31 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | What do you mean when you say "I have to prove..."? Why are you not allowed to use the Baire category theorem? | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 12:18 | history | asked | Sosha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |