Skip to main content
added 20 characters in body
Source Link
Danny Ruberman
  • 19.4k
  • 1
  • 60
  • 97

The cohomology groups of the Grassmann manifold are worked out in combinatorial terms in L. Casian'sLuis Casian and Yuji Kodama's paper, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5520v1.pdf; he makesthey make a conjecture at the end about the multiplicative structure. The authorauthors actually doesdo the example you ask about; he computesthey compute the groups for $G_2(R^5)$ but that's homeomorphic to $G_3(R^5)$ by taking the perpendicular complement. The answer is simple enough that you could probably work out the ring structure by the requirements of Poincaré duality (plus some considerations about the universal coefficient theorem and Bocksteins).

The cohomology groups of the Grassmann manifold are worked out in combinatorial terms in L. Casian's paper, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5520v1.pdf; he makes a conjecture at the end about the multiplicative structure. The author actually does the example you ask about; he computes the groups for $G_2(R^5)$ but that's homeomorphic to $G_3(R^5)$ by taking the perpendicular complement. The answer is simple enough that you could probably work out the ring structure by the requirements of Poincaré duality (plus some considerations about the universal coefficient theorem and Bocksteins).

The cohomology groups of the Grassmann manifold are worked out in combinatorial terms in Luis Casian and Yuji Kodama's paper, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5520v1.pdf; they make a conjecture at the end about the multiplicative structure. The authors actually do the example you ask about; they compute the groups for $G_2(R^5)$ but that's homeomorphic to $G_3(R^5)$ by taking the perpendicular complement. The answer is simple enough that you could probably work out the ring structure by the requirements of Poincaré duality (plus some considerations about the universal coefficient theorem and Bocksteins).

Source Link
Danny Ruberman
  • 19.4k
  • 1
  • 60
  • 97

The cohomology groups of the Grassmann manifold are worked out in combinatorial terms in L. Casian's paper, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5520v1.pdf; he makes a conjecture at the end about the multiplicative structure. The author actually does the example you ask about; he computes the groups for $G_2(R^5)$ but that's homeomorphic to $G_3(R^5)$ by taking the perpendicular complement. The answer is simple enough that you could probably work out the ring structure by the requirements of Poincaré duality (plus some considerations about the universal coefficient theorem and Bocksteins).