Skip to main content
removed a wrong argument
Source Link
Peter Mueller
  • 22.5k
  • 1
  • 75
  • 107

This answer produces $I$ somewhat indirectly. So it actually does not what the OP asked for.

The decomposition group $D$, which is the Galois group of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$, can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $D$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

As Will Sawin already remarked, the inertia group $I$ is a subgroup of $S_2\times S_2$. On the other hand, $D/I$, as a Galois group of an extension of a finite field extension, is cyclic. This forces $|I|\ge4$, because a dihedral group of order $8$ modulo a normal subgroup of order $\le2$ isn't cyclic. Thus $I=S_2\times S_2$.

There is a paper by Sybilla Beckmann which describes a method to compute inertia groups under certain restrictions. Her theorem does not apply here. The paper finishes with some remarks about how to possibly extend the methods.

This answer produces $I$ somewhat indirectly. So it actually does not what the OP asked for.

The decomposition group $D$, which is the Galois group of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$, can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $D$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

As Will Sawin already remarked, the inertia group $I$ is a subgroup of $S_2\times S_2$. On the other hand, $D/I$, as a Galois group of a finite field extension, is cyclic. This forces $|I|\ge4$, because a dihedral group of order $8$ modulo a normal subgroup of order $\le2$ isn't cyclic. Thus $I=S_2\times S_2$.

There is a paper by Sybilla Beckmann which describes a method to compute inertia groups under certain restrictions. Her theorem does not apply here. The paper finishes with some remarks about how to possibly extend the methods.

This answer produces $I$ somewhat indirectly. So it actually does not what the OP asked for.

The decomposition group $D$, which is the Galois group of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$, can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $D$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

As Will Sawin already remarked, the inertia group $I$ is a subgroup of $S_2\times S_2$. On the other hand, $D/I$, as a Galois group of an extension of a finite field, is cyclic. This forces $|I|\ge4$, because a dihedral group of order $8$ modulo a normal subgroup of order $\le2$ isn't cyclic. Thus $I=S_2\times S_2$.

There is a paper by Sybilla Beckmann which describes a method to compute inertia groups under certain restrictions. Her theorem does not apply here. The paper finishes with some remarks about how to possibly extend the methods.

removed a wrong argument
Source Link
Peter Mueller
  • 22.5k
  • 1
  • 75
  • 107

This answer produces $I$ somewhat indirectly. So it actually does not what the OP asked for.

The decomposition group $D$, which is the Galois group of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$, can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $D$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

As Will Sawin already remarked, the inertia group $I$ is a subgroup of $S_2\times S_2$. FromOn the factorization ofother hand, $h(x)$ over$D/I$, as a Galois group of a finite field extension, is cyclic. This forces $\mathbb F_2$ we furthermore see that$|I|\ge4$, because a dihedral group of order $D/I$ has$8$ modulo a normal subgroup of order $2$$\le2$ isn't cyclic. So actuallyThus $I=S_2\times S_2$.

There is a paper by Sybilla Beckmann which describes a method to compute inertia groups under certain restrictions. Her theorem does not apply here. The paper finishes with some remarks about how to possibly extend the methods.

This answer produces $I$ somewhat indirectly. So it actually does not what the OP asked for.

The decomposition group $D$, which is the Galois group of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$, can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $D$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

As Will Sawin already remarked, the inertia group $I$ is a subgroup of $S_2\times S_2$. From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb F_2$ we furthermore see that $D/I$ has order $2$. So actually $I=S_2\times S_2$.

There is a paper by Sybilla Beckmann which describes a method to compute inertia groups under certain restrictions. Her theorem does not apply here. The paper finishes with some remarks about how to possibly extend the methods.

This answer produces $I$ somewhat indirectly. So it actually does not what the OP asked for.

The decomposition group $D$, which is the Galois group of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$, can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $D$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

As Will Sawin already remarked, the inertia group $I$ is a subgroup of $S_2\times S_2$. On the other hand, $D/I$, as a Galois group of a finite field extension, is cyclic. This forces $|I|\ge4$, because a dihedral group of order $8$ modulo a normal subgroup of order $\le2$ isn't cyclic. Thus $I=S_2\times S_2$.

There is a paper by Sybilla Beckmann which describes a method to compute inertia groups under certain restrictions. Her theorem does not apply here. The paper finishes with some remarks about how to possibly extend the methods.

added 645 characters in body
Source Link
Peter Mueller
  • 22.5k
  • 1
  • 75
  • 107

This answer produces $I$ somewhat indirectly. So it actually does not what the OP asked for.

The Galoisdecomposition group $G$$D$, which is the Galois group of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$, can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $G$$D$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

As Will Sawin already remarked, the inertia group $I$ is a subgroup of $S_2\times S_2$. From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb F_2$ we furthermore see that $D/I$ has order $2$. So actually $I=S_2\times S_2$.

There is a paper by Sybilla Beckmann which describes a method to compute inertia groups under certain restrictions. Her theorem does not apply here. The paper finishes with some remarks about how to possibly extend the methods.

The Galois group $G$ of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $G$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

This answer produces $I$ somewhat indirectly. So it actually does not what the OP asked for.

The decomposition group $D$, which is the Galois group of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$, can be computed as follows: Using resultants, one sees that the minimal polynomial over $\mathbb Q$ of the difference of two distinct roots of $h(x)$ is \begin{equation} H(y)=y^{20}+6y^{18}+21y^{16}+46y^{14}-116y^{12}+694y^{10}+1837y^8-1810y^6-1527y^4+8560y^2+9584. \end{equation} From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb Q_2$ we know that $D$ is a transitive subgroup of $S_4$. Over $\mathbb Q_2$ the polynomial $H(y)$ factors into irreducibles of degrees $4,4,4,8$. The only transitive subgroup of $S_4$ which has these orbit lengths on the $20$ pairs of distinct elements of $\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ is the dihedral group of order $8$.

As Will Sawin already remarked, the inertia group $I$ is a subgroup of $S_2\times S_2$. From the factorization of $h(x)$ over $\mathbb F_2$ we furthermore see that $D/I$ has order $2$. So actually $I=S_2\times S_2$.

There is a paper by Sybilla Beckmann which describes a method to compute inertia groups under certain restrictions. Her theorem does not apply here. The paper finishes with some remarks about how to possibly extend the methods.

Source Link
Peter Mueller
  • 22.5k
  • 1
  • 75
  • 107
Loading