Timeline for Unexpectedly prime rich cubic polynomial
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 at 14:55 | comment | added | joro | Thank you for verifying :) About differences of Mathematica/Pari, there is a question like "CAS errors", there you can find examples when they disagree. | |
| Aug 14, 2015 at 13:57 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @joro Yes, I understood that. it's just that you asked in the question to check your numbers, and it is at least true that Mathematica and Pari/GP agree (not always true, I suspect) | |
| Aug 14, 2015 at 12:58 | comment | added | joro | I mean I was wrong about the constant, not the numbers in the question. | |
| Aug 14, 2015 at 12:56 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @joro by the way, Mathematica does give the same numbers as yours for the numbers of prime values... | |
| Aug 14, 2015 at 12:24 | vote | accept | joro | ||
| Aug 14, 2015 at 11:50 | comment | added | joro | Oh, it was my mistake, now I confirm your result. | |
| Aug 14, 2015 at 10:59 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @joro first 10000 primes. | |
| Aug 14, 2015 at 7:52 | comment | added | ABCDveve | Cohen has a draft preprint, on fast computation of Hardy-Littlewood constants. Maybe it is already in GP/PARI? math.u-bordeaux1.fr/~cohen/hardylw.dvi | |
| Aug 14, 2015 at 6:34 | comment | added | joro | Did you compute infinite or finite product? If finite to what bound? | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 17:11 | comment | added | joro | Thanks. This might be sage bug or my mistake, but I get quite lower constant in sage. | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 16:43 | history | edited | Igor Rivin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added ref to BH
|
| Aug 13, 2015 at 16:32 | history | answered | Igor Rivin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |