Timeline for What algebraic group does Tannaka-Krein reconstruct when fed the category of modules of a non-algebraic Lie algebra?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2010 at 4:18 | history | edited | Torsten Ekedahl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Restricted one statement to the complex base field
|
| Apr 16, 2010 at 6:09 | history | edited | Torsten Ekedahl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added what may be an actual answer to the question
|
| Apr 15, 2010 at 18:38 | comment | added | Torsten Ekedahl | No, I don't think so. The intent is certainly that is the same throughout. I do however switch freely back and forth between $G$-representations and $\mathfrak g$-representations as their categories are equivalent. | |
| Apr 15, 2010 at 15:35 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Was there some point above at which $\mathfrak{g}$ switched from the finite dimensional Lie algebra we had in the beginning to the infinite dimensional Lie(G)? | |
| Apr 15, 2010 at 13:27 | history | answered | Torsten Ekedahl | CC BY-SA 2.5 |