Timeline for Submersion theorem for smooth tame Frechet manifolds
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2015 at 6:01 | vote | accept | mdg | ||
| Aug 12, 2015 at 10:38 | answer | added | Tobias Diez | timeline score: 7 | |
| Aug 12, 2015 at 6:16 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | Have you looked up Nash's implicit function theorem? | |
| Aug 12, 2015 at 2:58 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | You'd need to take 'regular value' (EDIT: at least for dim(source) bigger than dim(target)) to mean that in a neighbourhood the map looks like a split surjection, not just surjective on tangent spaces (or even a split surjection on tangent spaces). In that case, the fibre is, I think, a regular submanifold. I'm sure this should be true for locally convex manifolds in general. | |
| Aug 12, 2015 at 2:04 | history | edited | mdg |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 12, 2015 at 2:03 | history | edited | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo in title
|
| Aug 12, 2015 at 2:02 | history | edited | mdg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2015 at 1:45 | history | edited | mdg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 276 characters in body
|
| Aug 12, 2015 at 0:16 | history | asked | mdg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |