Timeline for Hausdorff dimension of a Cantor-like set
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2015 at 20:23 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | OK - fair enough... | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:34 | vote | accept | vizietto | ||
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:02 | comment | added | Adam P. Goucher | @AnthonyQuas It certainly does -- that was the reason for including an empty interval between each pair of possibly-non-empty intervals in $K_1$. Note that we only consider the first 'digit' in which $x$ and $y$ differ, and treat the remaining 'digits' as an arbitrary real in $[0, 1]$. | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 18:20 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | Your answer doesn't seem to address the possibility that $x$ has some digits dominating those of $y$ and other digits with the reverse ordering. | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 17:49 | history | answered | Adam P. Goucher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |