Timeline for Low dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2017 at 21:16 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | An updated comment: J. Algebra and other Elsevier journals now make older articles like this freely available. See sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021869306005254 | |
| Apr 16, 2010 at 20:25 | comment | added | Pasha Zusmanovich | @Jim: LT would be a nice idea, actually. QA, on the other hand, looks to me as an (almost) complete nonsense: it's typical usage by many people seems to be "anything fashionable with an algebraic flavor". I, too, find it a tough task to choose a suitable list of arXiv subjects for daily browsing. | |
| Apr 16, 2010 at 17:23 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @Pasha: Probably the arXiv labels will need tweaking over time. Maybe add an LT (Lie theory) option? But like MathSciNet it is tricky to devise permanent classifications, since those that fall into disuse can't be recycled like old telephone numbers without messing up searches. My problem with arXiv is that I don't have time or energy to browse daily the bigger lists (CO, GR, RA, QA, etc.) so I focus on a few labels and trust people to cross-reference carefully when they post. This blog invents lots of new tags, maybe too many to keep track of. | |
| Apr 15, 2010 at 18:10 | comment | added | Pasha Zusmanovich | It seems there are two schools of thought: those who think that anything Lie-algebraic belongs to math.RT (the majority), and those who think it belongs to math.RA (unless some heavy-duty representation theory is not involved indeed). | |
| Apr 15, 2010 at 13:16 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | This is a helpful reference, since de Graaf is well grounded in the subject matter and has a lot of computational expertise as well. Note that his arXiv preprint is posted only in v1, while the published paper has an expanded reference list and presumably a number of other changes (he thanks the "referees" for improving the exposition). Note too that the arXiv subject is math.RA, which unfortunately I don't routinely consult. This is one case where the 17B in MathSciNet works better for me; but no system is perfect. | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 21:03 | history | answered | Pasha Zusmanovich | CC BY-SA 2.5 |