Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 15, 2010 at 10:41 answer added John Stillwell timeline score: 6
Apr 15, 2010 at 6:20 answer added Sebastian timeline score: 2
Apr 14, 2010 at 17:06 comment added Andy Putman @Andrew L - All of these methods are constructive and visual; it just depends on how they are presented. In any case, if you like the combinatorial approaches, then I recommend you check out Conway's "ZIP proof", which is combinatorial but even more constructive and visual than the old-fashioned one.
Apr 14, 2010 at 17:02 comment added The Mathemagician I like the good old fashioned combinatorial method of Rado.Yes,it's tedious,but it has the advantage of being constructive and highly visual.
Apr 14, 2010 at 15:22 comment added Deane Yang @Andy: Thanks! The proof in Hirsch's book, Differential Topology, looks like what I want.
Apr 14, 2010 at 15:21 comment added Andy Putman If you want to start with a smooth structure, then use Morse theory. It's easy -- all you have to check is that if you start with a (possibly disconnected) cpt orientable surface with bdry that's covered by the classification and attach a k-handle for k=0,1,2, then you get a surface covered by the classification (a Morse fcn gives a handle decomp of your mnfld). Adding a 0-handle is taking the disjoint union with a disc and adding a 2-handle is gluing a disc to a bdry cpt, so these cases are easy. For a 1-handle, once you draw the picture you'll see that there are 3 special cases to check.
Apr 14, 2010 at 15:15 answer added Tony Huynh timeline score: 1
Apr 14, 2010 at 15:12 history edited Deane Yang CC BY-SA 2.5
added 80 characters in body
Apr 14, 2010 at 14:57 answer added Scott Carter timeline score: 2
Apr 14, 2010 at 14:34 comment added Andy Putman I gave a list of various proofs in my answer to this question : mathoverflow.net/questions/20438/…
Apr 14, 2010 at 14:26 history asked Deane Yang CC BY-SA 2.5