Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 14, 2010 at 16:51 vote accept Benoît Kloeckner
Apr 14, 2010 at 16:42 comment added Benoît Kloeckner @Nate Elredge: here I consider non constant curves only. It seems the most reasonnable choice: if you want the Jordan theorem to apply to all Jordan curves, then certainly you don't want to call a point a Jordan curve.
Apr 14, 2010 at 15:52 comment added Nate Eldredge Somewhat off-topic question: a point is not a Jordan curve? Wikipedia's definitions seem to allow this (see articles on "Jordan Curve" and "Curve").
Apr 14, 2010 at 14:46 history edited Reid Barton CC BY-SA 2.5
edited title
Apr 14, 2010 at 14:40 answer added Miguel timeline score: 2
Apr 14, 2010 at 12:38 comment added Joel David Hamkins For the R^3 case, here is an interesting article: mscand.dk/article.php?id=77. They partition R^3 into unlinked congruent circles, and also consider other more arbitrary families of curves. Partitioning R^3 into circles is constructive, but for the more exotic partitions, the Axiom of Choice is used.
Apr 14, 2010 at 12:13 answer added t3suji timeline score: 4
Apr 14, 2010 at 12:04 comment added damiano Instead of using the axiom of choice, choose a dense countable set of points in the plane. Associated to the first point in the set, there is a circle. Inside this circle, find the point in your dense countable set with least index and repeat. This might "guide" you through the circles, without using the axiom of choice.
Apr 14, 2010 at 11:37 history asked Benoît Kloeckner CC BY-SA 2.5