Timeline for Young's lattice and the Weyl algebra
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2011 at 18:59 | answer | added | David Hill | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 16, 2011 at 18:42 | answer | added | Gjergji Zaimi | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 5, 2009 at 16:14 | vote | accept | Qiaochu Yuan | ||
| Oct 25, 2009 at 21:27 | history | edited | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Asked a more precise question.
|
| Oct 23, 2009 at 19:12 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 12 | |
| Oct 23, 2009 at 18:38 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | If I'm not mistaken you can take U = x - dx, D = x + dx, but I don't know if this is the "natural" interpretation. | |
| Oct 23, 2009 at 18:31 | comment | added | Sammy Black | In type B, the poset of ordered pairs of Young diagrams describes the branching rules for the hyperoctahedral group. Here, the corresponding relation is DU - UD = 2I. Is there a natural way to rescale one of the variables so that these are "differential operators" in a sensible way? | |
| Oct 23, 2009 at 17:26 | history | asked | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |