Timeline for Relationship between étale and topological $K(\pi,1)$s
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2015 at 14:53 | vote | accept | Alex Youcis | ||
| Jul 26, 2015 at 9:44 | answer | added | Piotr Achinger | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 25, 2015 at 20:24 | comment | added | Niels | Question 2 is reminiscent of the Malcev-Grothendieck theorem : if the étale fundamental group of a smooth complex projective variety is trivial, then there is no non-trivial bundle with a flat connection. See the introduction of arxiv.org/abs/1112.4603 . | |
| Jul 25, 2015 at 15:53 | answer | added | Donu Arapura | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jul 25, 2015 at 15:15 | history | edited | Alex Youcis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Jul 25, 2015 at 15:10 | comment | added | Donu Arapura | I strongly suspect that the main question is false, but I'll need to think more about it. There is a typo in 2 by the way. 2 and 3 are open as far as I know. Although there exists smooth projective varieties with non residually finite fundamental groups (Toledo,...). | |
| Jul 25, 2015 at 14:44 | comment | added | Alex Youcis | @potentiallydense I may be the potentially dense one. :) Thanks for pointing that out. | |
| Jul 25, 2015 at 14:43 | history | edited | Alex Youcis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 25, 2015 at 14:41 | history | asked | Alex Youcis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |