Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 24, 2015 at 12:30 history edited Qfwfq CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 5 characters in body
Jul 24, 2015 at 7:31 answer added user61522 timeline score: 11
Jul 23, 2015 at 21:21 answer added Sándor Kovács timeline score: 11
Jul 23, 2015 at 21:09 answer added Donu Arapura timeline score: 10
Jul 23, 2015 at 20:55 comment added Jason Starr I think somebody changed the statement of the question. Before, if memory serves, the question asked for a proof. Now the question asks for intuition. If you are going to change the statement, you should correct that exponent $-1$.
Jul 23, 2015 at 20:22 comment added meh Perhaps stupidly, for curves the statement is clear. So one could think of it along the lines of what can one generalize from the curve case. RR and vanishing allows one to calculate global sections and hence provides motivation for why one would try and prove such a result.
Jul 23, 2015 at 20:12 comment added Noam D. Elkies If you want an intuition for a theorem about "$H^q$" of a "line bundle with positive-definite curvature form", you probably need an intuition for what $H^q$ and that condition on $L$ mean. Is there a standard intuitive/heuristic interpretation of these notions?
Jul 23, 2015 at 20:05 history edited user76356 CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 7 characters in body; edited title
Jul 23, 2015 at 18:32 comment added Sándor Kovács I'm not sure what you are asking. There are many proofs available. I think the easiest way to see that a theorem is true is to read a proof. I personally like Kollár's proof: goo.gl/bzE5Ho
Jul 23, 2015 at 17:43 comment added Jason Starr There should not be any exponent "$-1$" on the dualizing invertible sheaf.
Jul 23, 2015 at 17:40 review First posts
Jul 23, 2015 at 17:55
Jul 23, 2015 at 17:37 history asked user76356 CC BY-SA 3.0