Timeline for Does the proof of Conjectures B and D of Hardy and Littlewood have any implication on the generalized Riemann hypothesis they used?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2015 at 19:25 | comment | added | John Washburn | I suspect the answer is no. The ternary Goldbach conjecture is presented on page 3 and is a result of the their GRH and the circle method. The ternary Goldbach conjecture though is now a theorem and this result had no implication on the veracity of the GRH used by Hardy and Littlewood. | |
| Jul 23, 2015 at 19:18 | history | edited | John Washburn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected misspellings: Reimann and Rieman with Riemann
|
| Jul 22, 2015 at 21:52 | comment | added | GH from MO | I completely agree with Greg Martin. In particular, I have never heard of any implication in the other way. | |
| Jul 22, 2015 at 20:42 | history | edited | Jeremy Rickard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling
|
| Jul 22, 2015 at 19:09 | comment | added | Greg Martin | Now that we're done commenting on spelling errors without editing to correct them ... no, I don't know of any result that shows that these conjectures imply the relevant Riemann hypothesis. (Of course, both statements are likely to be proved true someday, so logically speaking, any statement will imply them.) | |
| Jul 22, 2015 at 19:04 | comment | added | Stopple | 6 times if you count the 'ei' and the single 'n' as separate errors. | |
| Jul 22, 2015 at 16:38 | comment | added | M.G. | *4 times if we count the title. | |
| Jul 22, 2015 at 16:27 | comment | added | M.G. | -1 for spelling Riemann wrong 3 times in a single post. | |
| Jul 22, 2015 at 16:15 | comment | added | Sylvain JULIEN | Your question is interesting, but please keep in mind that the right spelling is Riemann, not Reimann. | |
| Jul 22, 2015 at 15:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 22, 2015 at 15:30 | |||||
| Jul 22, 2015 at 15:21 | history | asked | John Washburn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |