Timeline for Do non-associative objects have a natural notion of representation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2020 at 7:00 | comment | added | Tim Campion | Just noting that at the current moment, the time-travel layers are multiplied by the fact that the Dec 2017 comment was made by a user whose username is currently displaying as "Reinstate Monica", which didn't make any sense until late 2019. | |
| Dec 14, 2017 at 4:44 | comment | added | silvascientist | @LSpice No, Qiaochu$_{2010}$ does not exist anymore, and has been replaced by the new and upgraded Qiaochu$_{2017}$. Qiaochu$_{2010}$ is no longer silly, as Qiaochu$_{2010}$ is no more. | |
| May 12, 2017 at 20:34 | comment | added | LSpice | @QiaochuYuan, hmm, when time-addressing people, is it appropriate to use the past tense? Surely the proper way to express your sentiment is that $\text{Qiaochu}_{2010}$ is silly. :-) | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 8:35 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Qiaochu$_{2010}$ was silly. This answer is clearly correct. | |
| Feb 10, 2014 at 8:34 | vote | accept | Qiaochu Yuan | ||
| Apr 13, 2010 at 2:53 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Picking a bunch of functions is pretty much what you do when you define a magma, but with V=M. | |
| Apr 13, 2010 at 2:02 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | That's a depressing definition of a representation of a magma; you just pick a function V -> V for each element of the magma in a way that is independent of the the binary operation. The kind of answer I have in mind won't necessarily have anything to do with functions from a set to itself... | |
| Apr 13, 2010 at 1:25 | history | answered | S. Carnahan♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |