Timeline for Growth of the size of iterated polynomials
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2017 at 18:11 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 14 characters in body
|
| S May 17, 2017 at 17:01 | history | suggested | Adam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
link to article in pdf format
|
| May 17, 2017 at 16:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 17, 2017 at 17:01 | |||||
| Jul 16, 2015 at 22:51 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 814 characters in body
|
| Jul 16, 2015 at 7:10 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 113 characters in body
|
| Jul 15, 2015 at 22:37 | comment | added | Joe Silverman | Actually, the assumption that $p(x)$ has integer coefficients and that $a$ is an integer has some relevance, namely either $a$ is preperiodic, or it is in the domain of attraction of infinity. So the only way for it to be in $K(p)$ is if it is actually preperiodic. | |
| Jul 15, 2015 at 20:49 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 210 characters in body
|
| Jul 15, 2015 at 20:44 | history | answered | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |