Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 15, 2015 at 16:03 vote accept Stanley Yao Xiao
Jul 15, 2015 at 14:04 answer added GNiklasch timeline score: 3
Jul 15, 2015 at 13:04 history edited Stanley Yao Xiao CC BY-SA 3.0
added 90 characters in body
Jul 15, 2015 at 13:02 comment added Stanley Yao Xiao @GNiklasch For your first question I am sure that the latter is more desirable, but the former might work as well. For the second question, a suitable subgroup of positive rank would work.
Jul 15, 2015 at 12:15 comment added GNiklasch Also, do you insist on a representation of the entire unit group, or are you interested in (suitably specified) subgroups of units as well?
S Jul 15, 2015 at 11:56 history suggested GNiklasch CC BY-SA 3.0
notation mathcal O
Jul 15, 2015 at 11:52 comment added GNiklasch Are you looking for a (any old) representation, or do you intend to stick to the one induced by the multiplication?
Jul 15, 2015 at 11:51 review Suggested edits
S Jul 15, 2015 at 11:56
Jul 14, 2015 at 21:03 history edited Stanley Yao Xiao CC BY-SA 3.0
added 195 characters in body
Jul 14, 2015 at 21:00 comment added Stanley Yao Xiao That's precisely what I am wondering... I will make the question more precise.
Jul 14, 2015 at 20:36 comment added Eric Naslund If $n<d$, then multiplication by $\alpha$ might take us out of the $\mathbb{Z}$-span of $\omega_1,\dots,\omega_n$. How are you defining $A$ as an operator on $\mathbb{Z}^n$ in this case?
Jul 14, 2015 at 16:51 history asked Stanley Yao Xiao CC BY-SA 3.0